We are often besotted by the best sportsmen in the games we follow; a Golf fanatic would trace the heroics of Arnold Palmer; an Athletics freak would range around Usain Bolt’s exploits and a Tennis lover would love to explore more about Roger Federer.
We may happily write an extract or two on our favorite sportsmen. Yet, when the writing comes as a responsibility; we feel the pangs. You may yearn to make use of this service by checking the site if you were pressed to write a 1000-word essay on the sporty topic.
You can take a serialized path and fragment the write-up into segments. The meat of the paper would carry his exploits; his growth and one or two instances where he acted out of his skin and produced a scintillating result. The meat should aim at about 500 words.
The Introduction is important. You can make an objective enquiry and lay the facts in front of readers. You can alternatively curt a personal course and ingratiate your part as you stayed with him through the latter’s career. This has a way of warming the readers.
You should suggest in the Introduction as to the difference the sportsperson brought to the game. You may also trace the off-course antics and his style of training. You should end the Introduction in an open-ended manner so that it can conveniently lead to the meat. The introduction would pass the muster at 250 words.
You should strive to sketch patterns which are either unheard of or present the exploits through an altogether different perspective. Utilize the space to bring his magic to the fore; something which has made you write a 1000-word essay on him.
You should conclude the essay with a contented feeling, as if it has been a time well-spent. You have to summarize the piece into a selection of qualities that frame him and would sustain him in living memory for a long time. You may also leave a scope for conflict so as to give the write-up an argumentative flair. The conclusion should be about 250 words.
Whatever you do, you need to make sure that you have done comprehensive research on the sportsman. No errors are admissible, major or cursory. You should present the sportsman in such a light that he naturally becomes an epitome of excellence. Of course, the deeds have been his; you have just striven to augment the perception.